Fujifilm Manager: GFX Triumph and Full Frame Attack Strategy, Shrinking IBIS, AI Future, Fuji X-H2 Needs Breakthrough, COVID and More
Imaging-resource published a long and very interesting interview with various Fujifilm managers, including Toshihisa Iida).
Here is a summary:
COVID-19:
- COVID: all back to normal now. Chinese factory was closed for 2 weeks in February and the factory in the Philippines was closed in April
- due to closed retail shops, April was the worst month in terms of sales, now slowly recovering
- Fujifilm did better than the market trend, due to Fujfilm X-T4 and X100V launch
- demand for X-T4 is very strong
- in 2020, probably demand will not go back to the same level as last year
- when Fuji presents its fiscal reports, in the imaging division report there is the section “Electronic imaging” and this is almost 100% digital cameras and interchangeable lenses
- overall for the imaging segment, the profit is still relatively OK
- CIPA predicts a further 20% drop this year for the camera industry, but Fujifilm thinks that is too pessimistic
- Fujifilm focuses on high end devices and hence the drop should not be as bad
- GFX100 sales much higher than Fuji predicted and X-T3 demand is strong
- Fujifilm ignores Full Frame, which makes them different to all other companies
- instead of doing what everybody does, Fujifilm went a different path
GFX Triumph and Strategy
- top full frame cameras are priced around $3,000-5,000. Fujifilm targets those customers to expand customer base
- at that price point, people can choose full frame or upgrade to medium format GFX
- as flange distance is different, XF lenses can’t be adapted to GFX cameras
- you can adapt DSLR lenses to Fujifilm GFX with smart autofocus adapters
- 70-80% of GFX customers were coming from non-Fuji cameras. Most probably from full frame DSLR cameras
- GFX 50R targets street photographers. GFX 100 is more serious or professional photographers: Fashion, commercial, fashion portrait…
- high requests for GFX cameras also among museums and libraries for archival purpose
- Fujifilm GFX100 is currently the best selling GFX camera. GFX50R is close to GFX100 sales. GFX50S sees half the sales of GFX50R.
- GFX sells 50% better than they predicted
- GFX lens attachment rate: about 3 lenses per 1 GFX camera
- Fujifilm X system has a lower lens attachment rate than GFX system
- GFX system is really good business for Fujifilm
- the medium format look is striking to full-frame customers: 3D-feel, higher resolution, dynamic range, lenses than can resolve 100MP
- GFX is best for image quality
- size, weight, price… Fujifilm is looking on how to make medium-format attractive and realistic as a choice for customers
- the success with the GFX50R was its smaller size
- But with GFX100 Fujifilm wanted to make the perfect GFX camera, hence put IBIS into it for best usability, which made the camera bigger
- for GFX100 users portability is not as important as usability (for example handheld 100MP shooting thanks to IBIS)
- for the future, GFX has to become smaller and cheaper
AI / IBIS / new X-T4 shutter
- Fujifilm is investigating what AI can do to help future picture-taking
- current processor is not powerful enough to deal with AI, but Fujifilm thinks it will be included in cameras in the future
- IBIS in X-T4 and X-H1 can cooperate with the lens OIS
- But for the GFX 100 Fujifilm doesn’t have the cooperative stabilization because OIS can deliver almost all the stabilization performance
- the IBIS on X-T4 can exceed the OIS performance of the lens, hence up to 6.5 stops stabilization on X-T4
- Some lenses have a big image circle, so the IBIS unit can move further to stabilize the image.
- in order to make IBIS smaller, Fujifilm removed all 3 coil springs and replaced them with magnets
- X-H1 has six magnets. Three for sensing, and three for moving position. X-T4 has only three magnets doing both jobs
- this made IBIS 30% smaller and 20% lighter as well as 8 times more accurate thanks to a new gyro sensor (8x more detection accuracy of vibration than X-H1, making it possible to correct blur even at the edge of the image circle)
- current IBIS unit still too big for X-Pro body
- X-T4 impressive 300,000 actuations thanks to: new coreless DC motor for quick starting and stopping and more torque. Fuji changed the position of the injection into the mold for more rigidity. Newly-designed spring to absorb the shock
Fujifilm X-H2
- Fujifilm continues to “investigate future X-H cameras”
- X-T and X-H are two clearly different lines. What is the difference? “Difficult to say now; we need some sort of the breakthrough, probably.”
- it’s not enough for the X-H2 to be an X-T4 with bigger grip, “we have to have something more revolutionary.”
- X-H2 is where new technology will enter the product line
D-Pad removal & mixed
- some cameras have no D-Pad to avoid misoperating
- X-Pro3 has hidden tilt LCD to differenciate more from X-T4
Lenses
- GF requires a smaller number of lenses compared to the XF lens lineup, because with the XF we need big telephoto zooms, for example, to meet the demand for sports photographers
- XF33mmF1.0 was too big. Fujifilm went for the XF50mmF1.0, which also has much more beautiful bokeh than the XF33mmF1.0
Firmware
- X-T4 has digital image stabilization. Older Fuji cameras won’t get it via firmware update, because it probably requires the new gyro sensor present only on the X-T4
You can read the full and comprehensive interview at imaging-resource.
- XF50mmF1.0: BHphoto, AmazonUS, Adorama, Focuscamera
- Fujifilm X-T4: BHphoto, AmazonUS, Adorama, FocusCamera
Follow FujiRumors: Patreon, Facebook, Instagram, RSS-feed, Youtube, Flipboard and Twitter
Join Our Owners Groups
- Fujifilm GFX User Group
- Fujifilm X-T User Group
- Fujifilm X-H User Group
- Fujifilm X-E User Group
- Fujifilm X-Pro User Group
- Fujifilm X100 line Group
Join Our Facebook Pages