ANNOUNCED :: Fujinon XF 2.0x Teleconverter :: LIVE BLOGGING :: New 23mmF1.4 Lens Hood

2.0

hood

LIVE BLOGGING
Refresh This Page for the Latest Updates

_ _ _

Pre-order Options

2.0x Teleconverter: USA: BHphoto / AmazonUS / Adorama
XF23mmF1.4 Lens Hood LH-XF23: USA: BHphoto

Top Things To Know

  • 2.0x Teleconverter costs $449 in USA (same price of 1.4x Teleconverter) – £349 in UK
  • Will be release in mid June
  • It’s weather sealed
  • As of now, only 2 lenses are compatible with the 2.0x TC: the 50-140 and the 100-400.
  • A firmware update will be released at the beginning of June (2.0x TC support for 50-140 and 100-400)
  • Phase Detection works only with the 50-140. The 100-400 + 2.0x TC works with Contast Detection
  • The aperture becomes two f-stops higher

FIRST LOOKS

2.0x Teleconverter: jonasrask / michalkrause / bencherryphotos /

OFFICIAL PRODUCT PAGE, SAMPLES & PRESS RELEASE

2.0x Teleconverter: Official Press Release / Product Page with Samples /
XF23mmF1.4 Lens Hood LH-XF23: Fuji Accessory Page /

FULL PRESS RELEASE
Click READ MORE

** CLICK HERE to Read the Rest of the Article **

The Fashionable X-Pro2 – by F. James Conley

XPRO5459

NEW FEATURE
Submitted via GUEST POST PAGE

Write your own article on FujiRumros :-)
Submit Here

_ _ _

guest post by F. James Conley:  f-eleven.com / @philatawgrapher

Hi Patrick. I wanted to share a fashion editorial with you, and my experience using the Fujifilm X-Pro2 in the studio.

For a few years now, I’ve relied on Fujifilm’s X-Series as my workhorse system for documentary, street, and travel photography. Originally working with an X100s and an X-E1, I’ve now added the X-Pro2 to the stable. (These days, the X-E1 is a backup body.) However, for studio work I’ve continued to rely on Canon.

Studio work involves different kinds of habits from those of the photojournalism I usually do. The thought process in working with lights, settings, models, and scenes is nearly quite the opposite kind of thinking required to capture unfolding moments on the street. Studio work is slower and more deliberate, and the distractions of the equipment cannot be avoided, with each shot requiring manual adjustments of light stands and strobe settings.

For studio thinking, I always found a Canon DSLR a good match. The studio is about controlling light, and it’s often a dim place to work. Seeing directly through the lens is not only easier in low light, but it also makes me feel more connected to the model. Fleeting expressions are easy to catch, and small framing adjustments are quickly comprehended when looking through an SLR.

The X-E1 was impossible to consider for the task. The slow refresh rate of the EVF is very frustrating in low light. The X100s was too limited with its lens options (even taking into account the WCL and TCL). Its EVF suffers the same problems as the X-E1, and the rangefinder is not an acceptable solution because of parallax issues. So it was Fuji on the streets, and Canon in the studio.

With time, however, the Canon system has shown its age. Not the least of the frustrations is a limited number of focus points. Especially when shooting with wide apertures, “focus and reframe” can introduce a host of issues. There are also issues with low light performance. Working with an SLR, it is much harder to tell if the focus is correct in low light, and many times it isn’t.

Newer Canon bodies have more focus points and better low light performance, but that necessitates buying a newer body. I have a substantial investment in Canon glass, but unfortunately the technology has left them behind and there are many frustrations with focus speed and lock on. What was a great L-series lens a few years ago is now a slow-focuser with a lot of chromatic aberration.

With the X-Pro2 in hand, I finally had an option. The EVF is fast enough not to be a distraction, and the low light performance is excellent. Faced with the choice of upgrading the Canon system or testing the X-Pro2, it was easy to decide to get the Fuji hooked up to the lights see what would happen.

My approach to studio light is very simple: one or two Paul Buff lights, with a variety of modifiers. The lights are on radio triggers, with a transceiver on the camera. I shoot the camera in manual, and make adjustments to the lights as needed to achieve the exposure I want.

The first problem came when the radio triggers wouldn’t trip the light. Investigation into the issue led to no satisfying answers. I’ve used Yongnuo 603Cs for years with no issues. My first fear was a hotshoe issue with the X-Pro2. (In the past, I’ve found that Canon studio accessories worked with the Fujis.) Forging ahead, though, I made the assumption that the issue was with the Yongnuos and not the X-Pro2, and purchased a set of RadioPopper receivers and a transmitter. They worked straight out of the box with not a single misfire, so I’ve concluded that the pins on the Yongnuo 603C’s aren’t correct for the X-Pro2.

Although a stressful one, the trigger issue turned out to be the only issue. The X-Pro2 is a delight to use in the studio. The EVF gets out of the way, and there were very few focus issues—and only when there were a lot of shadows. The sensor on the X-Pro2 is fantastic, and gives a very film-like quality to the images, with incredible amounts of latitude.

Getting the X-Pro2 set up for studio use is short work:

  • set the shutter speed to 1/250th
  • set the ISO to 200
  • turn Preview Pic Effect off
  • turn the flash mode to on

Manually set the aperture, and away I go.

I’m looking forward to continuing to use the X-Pro2 in the studio. Even more, I’m looking forward to not having to buy a new Canon!

More images can be seen on my website: http://f-eleven.com, and on Instagram: @philatawgrapher

XPRO5342
** CLICK HERE to Read the Rest of the Article **

Fuji X-Pro2, my favorite camera (TheVerge) :: X-T1 Infrared & more (miXed zone)

Full List of Today’s Gold Box Deals: AmazonUS, BHphoto, AmazonDE, AmazonUK

Fujifilm X-Pro2

USA: BHphoto / AmazonUS / Adorama / CANADA: AmazonCA / EUROPE: AmazonDE / AmazonUK / WexUK / PCHstore / AmazonITA / AmazonFR / AmazonESP / AUSTRALIA: CameraPro

Fujifilm X-Pro2 review: my favorite camera at The Verge / Holidaying with X-Pro2 & X70 at ivanjoshualoh / The Fashion-able XPro-2 at fjamesconley / Fujifilm X-Pro1 & X-Pro2 Image Samples at leighmiller / Boudoir in Paris at prophotonut / The making of InSight: Venice – part 1 at dearsusan / Field test at imaging-resource / Two month review of the Fuji X-Pro2 at bershatsky / Combining exposures from the Fuji X-Pro2 to maximize dynamic range at aboutphotography-tomgrill + Tackling the night with the X-Pro2 — fading tulips, Part II at aboutphotography-tomgrill / Nick Cudworth / Portrait of the artist at afshoot / The City of Pikes, Stars and Bucks at olafphotoblog / My big, fat X-Pro2 “heat issue” real life report at eyesuncloudedphoto / Fujifilm X-PRO2 Review at Eric Gibaud youtube /
Photographing Amsterdam at Night ianmacdonaldphotography / Fuji X-Pro2 The Film Shooter’s Digital concreteshadows / Peper Harow, the Fuji X-Pro2 and Fujinon XF100-400 macfilos /

Other X-series cameras

Fujifilm’s X-T1 Infrared Camera qimago / X-T1: Guanajuato Part II – The Streets at flemmingbojensen / A Year with the Fujifilm X-T1 – Review at richwillnixon / An X-T1 Malfunction at thewanderinglensman / Fujifilm X70 in Peru: Cusco at stjeanm / Taking the X-T10 out on the South Pacific at fujix-pectations /

X100/S/T + X70

X70 Review at 35mmc / Fuji X70: First impression hands-on with the new Baby X at macfilos / X70 review at bershatsky / Fujifilm X70 Review at mariusmasalar / The Really Tiny X70 at neillsoden / Standstill: Six Years in Greece at lensculture / Fujifilm X70 review: the little camera that can at TheVerge /

Lenses

X-mount lenses

XF100-400 review at pcmag / Shooting with the 100-400 at dyannewilson / 14mm: Take a walk on the wide side… at laroquephoto /

Jpeg / RAW / Converters

My Iridient Developer X-Trans Guide Now Available at thomasfitzgeraldphotography / So Adobe has hoodwinked us Again it seems at xshooters /

Travel X

Spring a year ago – Landscape photography at miksmedia / Travel Photography with the Fuji Xpro2 at thefxworks / A trip to Venice with the two Fuji’s at garyksmithphotography / Skye in Photos, Scotland at danielkorzeniewskiphoto / Australia with the X-E1 at dariocannone / Japan with the X-T1 at dariocannone /

Acessories / Flash / Bags

Review: Cactus V6 Transceiver and the Fujifilm X system at morethanwords /

a bit of everything

Infrared photography trials at richardsimko / London and a mixed bag of Photography at robferrol / Roy Rozanski From Israel Tells Us How He Discovered That Most Important Thing In Street Photography at 121clicks / My 10 Favorite Settings for the X Series Cameras at danbaileyphoto / How Different Fuji Film Simulations Can Affect A Single Color at thewanderinglensman /

Comparison :: Fujifilm X-Pro2 Vs. Sony A6300 + X-Pro2 at High ISO !

Fuji X-Pro2: Shooting @ High ISO at tavphotography youtube

_ _ _

The Sony A6300 and the Fuji X-Pro2 are maybe the two best APS-C cameras you can get today on the market. Both sell very good, but which one is the better performer?

The Sony Vs. Fuji battle is a hot topic and comparisons are inevitable. Cameralabs tested the A6300 Vs. X-Pro2 here.

Admiringlight even compared Fuji’s new flagship to the Full Frame Sony A7II, as you can read here… with surprisingly good results for the X-Pro2, btw!

Sure, both, the A6300 and the X-Pro2 deliver amazing images in real life and you’ll hardly find something to complaint. But today let’s go deeper into the pixel peeper territory and look at “200% crops most of the time to show you the differences,” and where “we can easily file these small discrepancies into the irrelevant folder if we concentrate on real world shooting” as mirrorlessons said in their A6300 and X-Pro2 comparison.

In short:

Resolution and detail: RAW files difference is “almost non-existent“. Especially when using Iridient to demoisac the RAW files “the X-Pro2 files gain more details and they actual look crisper than the ones of the A6300. […] The a6300’s JPG engine has a tiny advantage because it renders finer details.”

Dynamic Range: “The uncompressed RAW option on the X-Pro2 gives more flexibility if you need to heavily post-process your images

Low Light and High ISO: At ISO12,800 the X-Pro2 shows less color noise, while the Sony A6300 has more details. In real world, both are “very usable” at high ISO. “As for the extreme values and the JPGs, the a6300 is superior.”

Colours: Guys, you know the winner here, right? ;)

Autofocus: “The a6300 has a few advantages (faster burst speed, better Eye AF and 3D Tracking) while the X-Pro2 has a better buffer with JPGs and is easier to use. When we look at the results and the consistency of the performance, both cameras work really well.”

Check out the full review at mirrorlessons.

Sony A6300 Vs. Fuji X-Pro2 :: Should Fujifilm Fear Sony’s new APS-C flagship?

DPreview Fujifilm X70 Review

why

Fujifilm X70
USA: BHphoto / AmazonUS / Adorama / CANADA: AmazonCA / EUROPE: AmazonDE / AmazonUK / AmazonITA / AmazonFR / AmazonESP / PCHstore / WexUK / AUSTRALIA: CameraPro

The Full Fuji X70 review is online at dpreview. Here are the Pros and Cons:

Pros

Film Simulation modes are superb and even more accessible with new control ring
Smart and handy built-in interval timer shooting
USB charging can save the day
Tilting touchscreen adds versatility to this segment
In-camera Raw conversion lets you gain full benefit from JPEG engine
Quiet leaf shutter
Easy-to-use Wi-Fi
Plenty of customizable buttons
Excellent color from JPEG images

Cons

Critical detail at 100% suffers
Waxy-looking skin in high ISO images
AF tends to hunt
Lens is not as high of quality as its rivals
16MP X-Trans sensor is at the end of its life
No viewfinder
X-Trans sensor design limits Raw-converter choice
Lack of external charger makes it hard to keep a spare battery topped-up